Road hierarchy and scale

Road classification is a means of recognising certain characteristics of the roads in a road network. Road hierarchy is a special type of road classification. It ranks the roads in a network in terms of some sort of graded importance. Very often the importance involves speed and journey distance – with the implication that these are related. Thus it could be argued that:

A motorway has a design speed of 120 km/hr, and is intended for long-distance journeys
An access road has a design speed of 20 km/hr and is intended for short-distance journeys

In fact, roads can be classified in many different ways – there are many different possible “classifiers” such as administrative ownership, journey distance etc. An earlier blog post suggested that there could be one “primary” classifier, and that this might be “speed” (see here). Speed as applied to highway design has less than 15 possible values.

Scale

Another idea with road networks is that they demonstrate fractal characteristics (discussed e.g. here) and that these characteristics are similar at different levels of scale. For example, at any scale a road network consists (only) of through links and access links. Again, we are implying some measure of scale when  we talk about  long-distance roads (motorways) and short distance roads (access roads).

Roads only make sense in terms of land use (you can’t have one without the other); and land use planners make frequent reference to scale. For example, Poland’s “National spatial development concept 2030” (ref. 381) refers to “the integration of the Polish space proceeds based on several parallel processes at various levels of management in diverse spatial dimensions” and at local, regional, national  and international scales”.

 The question then is, can we quantify scale when talking about roads and road hierarchy.

Straws in the wind

Some engineers and other specialists have already given numbers to road hierarchy and a measure of ‘scale’ in the sense of distance. For example:

  • Eppell and others (ref. 249) discuss the relationship between land use and road hierarchy. The paper has a figure suggesting a square cell size for land use of between 250m and 500m for collector streets and 500m to 1000m for arterial roads.
  • The paper by Stephen Marshall (ref. 388 page 62) says that Spain has a road classification based on trp length (a measure of distance), with for example:

scale 01

  • Taeke M. deJong in “An urban designer’s road hierarchy” (ref. 385) has a figure which suggests a relationship between road classification and a measure of spatial distance called “crossing distance”.  (Mr. deJong’s figure also relates each road class to road corridor width and the number of inhabitants served). Crossing distance may be a measure of land use cell size.

scale 02

Poland relates road classes and speed (see e.g. here). We can attempt to assign a value of speed to each of deJong’s road classes. For example, a metropolitan highway is likely to have a design speed of 120 km/hr whilst a neighbourhood road perhaps only 20 km/hr. If we produce such a relationship then we can also relate road classification and cell size (crossing distance) to time:

scale 03

The details may certainly be disputable but it does seem possible to relate road hierarchy to scale measured in terms of  speed, time and distance.

References

249 – Eppell and others, “A four level road hierarchy for network planning and management” (Australia 2001)

381 – Ministry of Regional Development, “NSDC national spatial development concept 2030” (Poland, 2012)

385 – Taeke M. de Jong, “An urban designer’s road hierarchy” published in the “Proceedings of the WSEAS International Conference on Urban Planning and Transportation” (Greece 2008)

388 – Stephen Marshall, “Artists –   A First Theoretical Approach to Classification of Arterial Streets”, (England, 2002)

Advertisements

About roadnotes

Robert Bartlett is an international consultant with over 30 years of professional experience as a highway and traffic engineer with leading companies and organisations in several countries, including Germany, China (Hong Kong), Qatar and the UK. Specialised in urban studies, transport and the use of GIS, research has included new ideas on subjects such as the study of social justice using GIS, the dimensions of vehicles, and comparative geometrics (highways and transport).
This entry was posted in classification, uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s