Too many standards ?

Initially I thought that for each country there would be more or less one standard or manual which set out recommended values for the geometric design of highways. After some months (which included a discussion on the topic in the Highway and Transportation Engineering Professionals group on LinkedIn). it now seems to me that countries generally fall into one of the following groups:

Multi-country standards

This is a situation where one document on standards is applicable to several countries. Examples include the standards for the Asian Highway and the UNECE standards for trans-European motorways. A multi-country standard is usually in addition to a country’s own standards and will differ from them.  In other words, there will be contradictions between the different standards.

Multi-standards country

Here one country will have several competing standards. Examples include the USA, Australia and probably the UK.

One country which seems to have a particular problem of this type is Georgia. Many of Georgia’s roads were built to Russian standards. Recently Georgia adopted new standards of its own  (the SST Gzebi:2009 / Georgia road design standards). Georgia has also adopted a number of different multi-country standards. For example, a 2011 presentation by Gogita Gvenetadze (Deputy Head of Transport Policy Department, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development) and EkaterineTsimakuridze, (Deputy Director of Land Transport Agency, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable DevelopmentofGeorgia) says that Georgia has adopted Asian highway (AH) legislation, Trans-European Motorway (TEM) legislation (and others).

There will be contradictions between the different standards.

Multi-standards standard

This case is where a country’s design manual is derived from a number of different standards developed by other countries). It is not clear how such standards are prepared – do you take (for example) driver eye height from USA standards, values for side friction from Australian standards, and the dimensions of a design car from UK recommendations?

There will be differences between the standards used to compile the country’s design manual, with the implied risk of internal contradictions in the compiled document.

Comment

Contradictions in a country’s highway design standards can lead to inconsistency in design, and hence a reduction in road safety. Further, how can an engineer decide which of the standards (or at least, which of the conflicting parts of the standards) most represents best practice?

Advertisements

About roadnotes

Robert Bartlett is an international consultant with over 30 years of professional experience as a highway and traffic engineer with leading companies and organisations in several countries, including Germany, China (Hong Kong), Qatar and the UK. Specialised in urban studies, transport and the use of GIS, research has included new ideas on subjects such as the study of social justice using GIS, the dimensions of vehicles, and comparative geometrics (highways and transport).
This entry was posted in highway design standards and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Too many standards ?

  1. Pingback: Simplification of standards (3) | Comparative Geometrics

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s